So originally when I made the rules here, http://censored.booru.org/index.php?page=forum&s=view&id=4, I decided to ban the stuff that was banned on 4chan's /d/, and I was forced to ban loli/shota because of the advertisers.

However, I recently found a post on booru.orgs patreon where they had reached their dontation goal and dropped the "no loli" advertisers. so I'm not going to delete any loli content unless it becomes a problem later on somehow.

Also recent uploaders have been uploading censored furry content. I'm willing to listen to my userbase and not completely ban them, but only if there is enough interest (and very few objections). If they do get allowed, they will have to be tagged "furry" so users can blacklist it, and I will not be tagging them like I do for other uploads.

So vote here in this topic about if furry should be allowed.

My vote still goes to no, so the tally starts at:
Yes furry - 0
No furry - 1

No furry.

Yes furry

Loli should definitely be allowed. Furry should be allowed too.

No Furry.
Thought about saying yes, but I'd stop uploading for sure if furry drowned out all other content and I don't want to risk that happening.

Yes furry.
If loli is okay then furry should definitely be okay too. So long as it's all tagged then there's no problem. I'm of the mindset that it should all be alright so long as it's tagged the main tag (like furry, loli, etc) and banning anything like that will just split the small community up even more than it needs to be.



The furry stuff won't drown anything out and it'll be tagged anyway so you can blacklist it, that's a pretty lazy and selfish reasoning honestly. I get that you're worried but there's really nothing to worry about at all if you actually think about it.

This is what blacklisting does(example uses tagme as the blacklisted tag): http://imgur.com/a/ba97C
In the hypothetical scenario that the last 20 images all were furry, you'd be greeted to a blank page. Not very encouraging. If someone took the bulk approach that I take to uploading, it'd be 20 pages of nothing.

I'm not saying I'll leave if furry is given the okay. I'm saying I'm leaving if what I described above is what I'm greeted with on multiple occasions.

Furry stuff is super scarce so it's really unlikely that'll ever happen. There aren't any editors that dedicate themselves to furry censors, if the people who've done furry censors did upload in bulk it'd be mostly non-furry with a few furry ones mixed in so that argument doesn't really hold up much if you take that into consideration. You won't see full pages of blanks, don't worry <3

Sure right now it's just a few furry images mixed in, but who's to say that in the future there won't be someone making lots of furry censors to upload. At that point it would become a problem, since, like CCA pointed out, the blacklist system would just blank out the page. There wouldn't be enough segregation.

I think that if I changed the rules now to allow furry, and then was later forced to ban them because there were too many, then the backlash from that would be much worse than if I had never allowed it. (or neglected to enforce it, like how the /d/ mods decided one day that words are banned).

<b>In the end, furry content is just too much trouble, and I don't want to deal with it.</b>

If someone wants censored furries, then the /c&d/ discord server has a channel for it. You could also try searching imagefap, or even make a thread on /trash/. If you need the tag search from a booru, then go make your own booru, it'd take like 10 minutes at booru.org/create to set one up for free.

1 - I don't think it will be a problem that is what tags are for.

I still don't think I'll change my mind on this.